Mission Statement

This blog is not intended to be a medium that simply furthers partisan ideas on either side of the political spectrum; rather, we at WASP Blog will try to take a more common-sense approach to issues instead of the typical bitter partisanship of media punditry circulating across the political spectrum today. While at times this blog will favor one argument over another on the issue at hand, such preference will only be shown when the author believes it is in the best interest of the nation, not to advance biased rhetoric. All posts will back up assertions and opinions with citations and practical/factual arguments, and are designed not to "spin" issues, rather they are designed to present issues and advocate the position for which the known facts seem to indicate is the better position. The term "WASP" effectively encapsulates this idea: When America Suffers from Politics means that America suffers at the hand of partisan politics instead of benefitting from a practical examination of individual issues. We at WASP Blog hope to bring attention back to the issues, first and foremost.

Note: Discussion will be kept as free as possible, but all comments deemed inappropriate will be removed.

Monday, November 17, 2008

A Time for Change

The most recent wave of economic troubles that has significantly eroded consumer confidence, buying power, and wealth in the United States dramatically points to a need for change in the way America operates.

Our national debt under President George W. Bush has ballooned to over $10 trillion, eroding the purchasing power of the dollar.  State governments across the nation are facing crippling deficits.  Unemployment continues to rise, and in states like Ohio, has passed 7%.  In August, U.S. News and World Report wrote that "the average American with a credit file is responsible for $16,635 in debt, excluding mortgages."  In a word, our current spending policies in this country are unsustainable, like those of a 16-year-old shopaholic.

Whether it's the federal, state, local government or citizens themselves, Americans spend far too much.  We've experienced immense prosperity over the last 15 or so years.  When we have had economic problems, they've been short, and the solution, as provided by our government, is to go out and shop.

To get back on track, we're going to experience some pain.  Although Obamaniacs don't think so, change is inevitably painful, whether sooner or later.  As an elementary example, if you change your daily habits to include working out, you deal with the necessary pain of exercising, but you later reap the benefits.  If you change your habits to stop working out, you will eventually feel the pain of increased medical bills/insurance rates and health problems sometime in your future, and you will likely look terrible and feel more insecure about yourself.  Regardless, change is eventually painful.  The key is to make the pain constructive: to make it work towards an achievable and desirable goal whose benefits eventually outweigh its costs.

Our federal and state governments have to be whipped into shape.  We have to get smarter.  We have to adapt to our changing world.  First, in order for America to continue to be the superpower it is today, we have to find a more sustainable way to combat those who wish us harm around the world.  While I would contend that our actions in the Middle East during the Bush Administration have done more good than harm, I recognize that the use of preventive war is far too economically cumbersome to be seriously considered as a major facet of our foreign policy going forward.  We have to find a more cost-effective way to combat terrorism and rogue states without invading.  

Second, we have to seriously cut back on domestic spending.  Cutting defense spending and increasing federal income taxes is just not enough.  We can't afford to bail out state after state because they are unable to find money to pay for the services they want to provide.  We should maintain educational standards and spending, but states have to cut back on nonessential programs to be able to make ends meet.  

There are a multitude of other things that have to change in this country, but the cold, hard fact of the matter is: governments need to return to truly conservative principles, becoming once again agents of defense and arbiters of justice, oversight, and regulation, with few exceptions.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

The Fairness Doctrine

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), whose Chairman and Commissioners include 3 Republicans and 2 Democrats, is considering rule changes that would, in effect, bring back the Fairness Doctrine, a tool used to create equity on radio airwaves that has been defunct now for over 20 years. As dcexaminer.com puts it, the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" is nothing more than an "Orwellian-named government effort to dictate the content of radio and TV news and opinion."

It always bothers me that government actions are usually named after some ridiculous euphemism to hide their real purposes.  Honestly, our lawmakers could pass legislation whose sole purpose might be to allow sociopaths the right to indiscriminately slaughter puppies and kittens everywhere to calm their instincts to kill humans, and call it the "Tranquil Waters Act."  The same goes for legislation like the PATRIOT Act: it's as though opposing such legislation makes you un-patriotic, which is ridiculous (unless your reason for opposing it is that you want the demise of the United States--that's treason, which is categorically unpatriotic).

The so-called "Fairness Doctrine," or whatever rule the FCC proposes that would serve the same purpose, falls under the same category.  Its function would be to coerce radio stations to air both sides of an issue, kind of like the same thing we try to do at WASP Blog by our own choice, but on the radio, because apparently radio is a market that is limited in regard to choice.  Admittedly, there is a strong bias towards conservative views on AM talk radio.  However, why does it matter?  If liberals want to indulge in liberal propaganda, why not watch virtually ANY cable/network news program (don't believe there's a bias towards liberals on TV? Read this and tell me there isn't.)

If the government is going to force broadcasters to air both sides of an issue--for example, a Christian radio station giving Satan-worshippers equal time to make their case to the audience--then why stop at radio?  Let's hit network and cable TV stations too!  And when we're done with that, we'll go for the blogs (luckily I think WASP Blog might not be forced to, but maybe Andrew will have to issue a retroactive nomination for Barack Obama for President in addition to his pro-McCain article, and tas817 will have to say that supply-side economics is a great economic theory too)!  The DailyKos won't mind putting out some conservative propaganda, will they?  I'm sure Michelle Malkin is itching to write about her excitement that Sen. John Kerry might be our next Secretary of State!  We won't stop there though.  The final stop will have to be state universities.  I'm sure the blue ivory towers of academia won't mind government henchmen in the back of their classrooms, making sure that both sides of an argument are presented!

The point is, if you're going to hit up radio for its bias, then you have to hit up every possible publication or pulpit out there.  It's a disastrous idea, and one that no lawmaker in his or her right mind should support.  I believe that we have the duty to be equitable when discussing controversial issues with one another (hence this blog).  However, we should be equitable by choice, not because the government thinks it's in our best interest.  Like Ronald Reagan said in 1964, the issue is "whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves."

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Congratulations!

Congratualtions to Senator Barack Obama, President-Elect!  Don't mess it up!  I'll be watching...

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

VOTE!

I voted, and you should too!  Get out and vote today if you haven't already!